1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2011 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2011 Nissan Rogue is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Rogue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2011 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Nissan |
Model | Silver Cloud | Rogue |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6230 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 60 L |