1966 Rover P5 vs. 2004 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2004 Suzuki XL7 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1966 Rover P5. (122 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 1966 Rover P5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Rover P5 weights approximately 60 kg more than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Suzuki XL7 (250 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Rover P5. (217 Nm). This means 2004 Suzuki XL7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Rover P5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Rover P5 | 2004 Suzuki XL7 | |
| Make | Rover | Suzuki |
| Model | P5 | XL7 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2995 cc | 2736 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.7 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.7 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 64 L |
