1966 Rover P5 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rover P5 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Rover P5 weights approximately 390 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 1966 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Rover P5 (217 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1966 Rover P5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Rover P5 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Rover | Mini |
Model | P5 | Countryman |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.7 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.7 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 47 L |