1966 Saab 96 vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Saab 96. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Saab 96 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Saab 96 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1966 Saab 96. (64 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1966 Saab 96. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 416 kg more than 1966 Saab 96. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Arosa (117 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Saab 96. (116 Nm). This means 2000 Seat Arosa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Saab 96.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Saab 96 | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
| Make | Saab | Seat |
| Model | 96 | Arosa |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 117 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 873 kg | 1289 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2850 mm |
