1966 Seat 1500 vs. 2003 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2003 Samsung SM3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Samsung SM3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Samsung SM3 (94 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1966 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Samsung SM3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 1500.
Because 1966 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Samsung SM3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Seat 1500 | 2003 Samsung SM3 | |
| Make | Seat | Samsung |
| Model | 1500 | SM3 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1481 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2540 mm |
