1966 Seat 1500 vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (260 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1966 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 850 kg more than 1966 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Seat 1500 | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Seat | Toyota |
| Model | 1500 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1481 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2800 mm |
