1966 Seat 1500 vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1966 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 296 kg more than 1966 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Seat 1500 | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Seat | Volvo |
Model | 1500 | C30 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2639 mm |