1966 Seat 1500 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1966 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 1500.
Because 1966 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Seat 1500 | 2011 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Seat | Chevrolet |
Model | 1500 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2852 mm |