1966 Seat 1500 vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford C-Max (150 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1966 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford C-Max weights approximately 215 kg more than 1966 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford C-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Seat 1500 | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Seat | Ford |
| Model | 1500 | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1481 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1626 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2648 mm |
