1966 Seat 1500 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,481 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Seat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Seat 1500 (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2012 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Seat 1500 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 340 kg more than 1966 Seat 1500.
Because 1966 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Seat 1500 | 2012 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Seat | Mitsubishi |
Model | 1500 | Colt |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 1332 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2500 mm |