1966 Seat 1500 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,481 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Seat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Cruze (134 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1966 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Cruze should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Cruze weights approximately 247 kg more than 1966 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Seat 1500 | 2013 Chevrolet Cruze | |
Make | Seat | Chevrolet |
Model | 1500 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1407 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2685 mm |