1966 Seat 1500 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (464 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 393 more horse power than 1966 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 715 kg more than 1966 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Seat 1500 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Seat | Jaguar |
Model | 1500 | XF |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 464 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2909 mm |