1966 Seat 600 vs. 2008 Toyota Camry

To start off, 2008 Toyota Camry is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 600 would be higher. At 3,311 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Camry (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1966 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Camry weights approximately 755 kg more than 1966 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Camry (298 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: