1966 Simca 1000 vs. 2011 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2011 Holden Cruze is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Cruze (110 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1966 Simca 1000. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1966 Simca 1000.
Because 1966 Simca 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Simca 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Cruze (153 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Simca 1000. (59 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Simca 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Simca 1000 | 2011 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Simca | Holden |
| Model | 1000 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 844 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 59 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2685 mm |
