1966 Simca 1000 vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1966 Simca 1000. (38 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1966 Simca 1000.
Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Simca 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Simca 1000. (65 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Simca 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Simca 1000 | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Simca | Mazda |
Model | 1000 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 944 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 65 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.1 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 3010 mm |