1966 Simca 1200S vs. 2003 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2003 Ford Windstar is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Simca 1200S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Simca 1200S would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Windstar (200 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1966 Simca 1200S. (79 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1966 Simca 1200S.
Because 1966 Simca 1200S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Simca 1200S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Simca 1200S | 2003 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Simca | Ford |
Model | 1200S | Windstar |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1204 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5103 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1946 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 3066 mm |