1966 Simca 1200S vs. 2005 Spyker C8
To start off, 2005 Spyker C8 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Simca 1200S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Simca 1200S would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Spyker C8 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1966 Simca 1200S.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Simca 1200S | 2005 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Simca | Spyker |
| Model | 1200S | C8 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1204 cc | 4172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 100 L |
