1966 Simca 1300 vs. 1998 ZAZ Slavuta
To start off, 1998 ZAZ Slavuta is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Simca 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Simca 1300 would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Simca 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 51 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Simca 1300 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1998 ZAZ Slavuta.
Because 1966 Simca 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Simca 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 ZAZ Slavuta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Simca 1300 | 1998 ZAZ Slavuta | |
Make | Simca | ZAZ |
Model | 1300 | Slavuta |
Year Released | 1966 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1289 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2330 mm |