1966 Skoda 1202 vs. 2001 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2001 Ford Windstar is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1966 Skoda 1202. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1966 Skoda 1202.
Because 1966 Skoda 1202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Skoda 1202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Skoda 1202 | 2001 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Skoda | Ford |
| Model | 1202 | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3066 mm |
