1966 Steyr 650T vs. 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+

To start off, 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 1,171 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1966 Steyr 650T. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ should accelerate faster than 1966 Steyr 650T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ weights approximately 355 kg more than 1966 Steyr 650T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Steyr 650T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Steyr 650T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ (106 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Steyr 650T.

Compare all specifications: