1966 Steyr 700C vs. 1982 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 1982 Suzuki Cervo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 643 cc (2 cylinders), 1966 Steyr 700C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Suzuki Cervo (26 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1966 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Suzuki Cervo should accelerate faster than 1966 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Steyr 700C weights approximately 5 kg more than 1982 Suzuki Cervo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Suzuki Cervo (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Steyr 700C. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1982 Suzuki Cervo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Steyr 700C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Steyr 700C | 1982 Suzuki Cervo | |
| Make | Steyr | Suzuki |
| Model | 700C | Cervo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 643 cc | 538 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 535 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3190 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1220 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1950 mm | 2040 mm |
