1966 Steyr Haflinger vs. 1987 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 1987 Suzuki Alto is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 641 cc (2 cylinders), 1966 Steyr Haflinger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Suzuki Alto (57 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1966 Steyr Haflinger. (24 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Suzuki Alto should accelerate faster than 1966 Steyr Haflinger.
Because 1966 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Suzuki Alto. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Suzuki Alto (74 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Steyr Haflinger. (41 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1987 Suzuki Alto will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Steyr Haflinger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Steyr Haflinger | 1987 Suzuki Alto | |
| Make | Steyr | Suzuki |
| Model | Haflinger | Alto |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1987 |
| Engine Size | 641 cc | 547 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 41 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2840 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2340 mm |
