1966 Subaru 360 vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Subaru 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Subaru 360 would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1966 Subaru 360. (20 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1966 Subaru 360.
Because 1966 Subaru 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Subaru 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Subaru 360. (35 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Subaru 360.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Subaru 360 | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Subaru | Volvo |
Model | 360 | C70 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 356 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 20 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 35 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1840 mm |