1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 125 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Volvo |
| Model | Tiger | 220 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 4259 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 45 L |
