1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 1996 Volvo 440
To start off, 1996 Volvo 440 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1996 Volvo 440. (83 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo 440. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 115 kg more than 1996 Volvo 440. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volvo 440, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 1996 Volvo 440 | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Volvo |
| Model | Tiger | 440 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
| Engine Size | 4259 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1025 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |
