1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2005 Audi TT
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2005 Audi TT. (149 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 200 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 2005 Audi TT | |
Make | Sunbeam | Audi |
Model | Tiger | TT |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Size | 4259 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 62 L |