1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2008 Volvo S40
To start off, 2008 Volvo S40 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S40 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 2008 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Volvo |
| Model | Tiger | S40 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 4259 cc | 1948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |
