1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2009 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2009 Toyota Camry is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Camry (268 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Camry weights approximately 544 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 2009 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Sunbeam | Toyota |
Model | Tiger | Camry |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Size | 4259 cc | 3455 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 268 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1684 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |