1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2009 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2009 Toyota Highlander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Highlander (270 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 190 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Toyota Highlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 2009 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Sunbeam | Toyota |
Model | Tiger | Highlander |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Size | 4259 cc | 3456 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 73 L |