1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2010 BMW X3
To start off, 2010 BMW X3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW X3 (260 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW X3 weights approximately 680 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 BMW X3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 2010 BMW X3 | |
| Make | Sunbeam | BMW |
| Model | Tiger | X3 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Size | 4259 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4569 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1854 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1676 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2797 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 67 L |
