1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 197 more horse power than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Holden |
| Model | Tiger | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Station Wagon |
| Engine Size | 4259 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 360 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
