1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2010 Mazda BT-50. (123 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Mazda |
| Model | Tiger | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
| Engine Size | 4259 cc | 2606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 50 L |
