1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder (187 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 2010 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Nissan |
| Model | Tiger | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Size | 4259 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 187 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4884 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1834 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 80 L |
