1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2011 Audi A7
To start off, 2011 Audi A7 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi A7 (201 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi A7 should accelerate faster than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 2011 Audi A7 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi A7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 2011 Audi A7 | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Audi |
| Model | Tiger | A7 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 4259 cc | 2800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 201 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4968 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2913 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 75 L |
