1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2011 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 2011 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Sunbeam | Chevrolet |
Model | Tiger | Malibu |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Size | 4259 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 61 L |