1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2011 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC70 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo XC70 (217 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 740 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Volvo XC70 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 2011 Volvo XC70 | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Volvo |
| Model | Tiger | XC70 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Size | 4259 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4838 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1862 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1604 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2815 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |
