1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2012 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2012 Renault Symbol is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP) has 99 more horse power than 2012 Renault Symbol. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Symbol. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 140 kg more than 2012 Renault Symbol. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Symbol, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 2012 Renault Symbol | |
Make | Sunbeam | Renault |
Model | Tiger | Symbol |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Size | 4259 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 64 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1639 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1439 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2473 mm |