1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 540 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 2012 Tata Nano | |
Make | Sunbeam | Tata |
Model | Tiger | Nano |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 4259 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 37 L |