1966 Suzuki Fronte vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1967 Triumph 2000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1967 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Suzuki Fronte | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Suzuki | Triumph |
Model | Fronte | 2000 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 785 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 64 L |