1966 Suzuki Fronte vs. 1968 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1968 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. Both 1966 Suzuki Fronte and 1968 Suzuki Fronte are equipped with a 785 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 35 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 81 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Suzuki Fronte | 1968 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Suzuki | Suzuki |
| Model | Fronte | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 785 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 66 L |
