1966 Suzuki Fronte vs. 1976 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1976 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 895 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Volkswagen Polo (39 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Suzuki Fronte weights approximately 70 kg more than 1976 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Suzuki Fronte (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volkswagen Polo. (57 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1966 Suzuki Fronte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Suzuki Fronte | 1976 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Suzuki | Volkswagen |
| Model | Fronte | Polo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 785 cc | 895 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 39 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Top Speed | 115 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 690 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 35 L |
