1966 Suzuki Fronte vs. 1980 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 1980 Toyota Tercel is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Tercel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Tercel (70 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Tercel should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Tercel weights approximately 60 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Suzuki Fronte | 1980 Toyota Tercel | |
| Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
| Model | Fronte | Tercel |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 785 cc | 1295 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2510 mm |
