1966 Suzuki Fronte vs. 1985 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1985 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,043 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Volkswagen Polo (39 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Suzuki Fronte weights approximately 60 kg more than 1985 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Suzuki Fronte (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Volkswagen Polo. (75 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1966 Suzuki Fronte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Suzuki Fronte | 1985 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Suzuki | Volkswagen |
Model | Fronte | Polo |
Year Released | 1966 | 1985 |
Engine Size | 785 cc | 1043 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 39 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 75 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 115 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2400 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 40 L |