1966 Suzuki Fronte vs. 1995 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1995 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 320 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Nissan Pulsar (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Suzuki Fronte | 1995 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Suzuki | Nissan |
| Model | Fronte | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
| Engine Size | 785 cc | 1596 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2440 mm |
