1966 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2008 Toyota Stallion
To start off, 2008 Toyota Stallion is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,812 cc, 2008 Toyota Stallion is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Stallion weights approximately 558 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 2008 Toyota Stallion is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Toyota Stallion. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Stallion (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Stallion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Suzuki Fronte | 2008 Toyota Stallion | |
Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
Model | Fronte | Stallion |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 785 cc | 1812 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1318 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 70 L |