1966 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 322 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 449 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Suzuki Fronte | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Suzuki | Holden |
| Model | Fronte | UTE |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 785 cc | 6000 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
