1966 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S40 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo S40 weights approximately 835 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S40 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Suzuki Fronte | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
Model | Fronte | S40 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 360 cc | 2521 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 504 kg | 1339 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 60 L |