1966 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-150 (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-150 weights approximately 762 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-150 (232 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Suzuki | Ford |
Model | Fronte | E-150 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 785 cc | 4600 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1522 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 62 L |