1966 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Pontiac G3
To start off, 2010 Pontiac G3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Pontiac G3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Pontiac G3 (105 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Pontiac G3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Pontiac G3 (142 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Pontiac G3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Pontiac G3 | |
Make | Suzuki | Pontiac |
Model | Fronte | G3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 785 cc | 1599 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 45 L |