1966 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2011 Audi RS3
To start off, 2011 Audi RS3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 300 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 2011 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Suzuki Fronte | 2011 Audi RS3 | |
Make | Suzuki | Audi |
Model | Fronte | RS3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 785 cc | 2500 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 115 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |